Русская версия English version   
Том 19   Выпуск 2   Год 2024
Список литературы

  1. Gudimchuk N.B., McIntosh J.R. Regulation of Microtubule Dynamics, Mechanics and Function through the Growing Tip. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021;22:777–795. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00399-x
  2. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic Instability of Microtubule Growth. Nature. 1984;312:237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0
  3. Desai A., Mitchison T.J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997;13:83–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83
  4. Gudimchuk N.B., Alexandrova V.V. Measuring and Modeling Forces Generated by Microtubules. Biophys. Rev. 2023;15:1095–1110. doi: 10.1007/s12551-023-01161-7
  5. Inoué S., Salmon E.D. Force Generation by Microtubule Assembly/Disassembly in Mitosis and Related Movements. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1995;6:1619–1640. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.12.1619
  6. Roll-Mecak A. The Tubulin Code in Microtubule Dynamics and Information Encoding. Dev. Cell. 2020;54:7–20. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.008
  7. Roll-Mecak A. Intrinsically Disordered Tubulin Tails: Complex Tuners of Microtubule Functions? Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015;37:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.09.026
  8. Vemu A., Atherton J., Spector J.O., Szyk A., Moores C.A., Roll-Mecak A. Structure and Dynamics of Single-Isoform Recombinant Neuronal Human Tubulin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016;291:12907–12915. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C116.731133
  9. Chen J., Kholina E., Szyk A., Fedorov V.A., Kovalenko I., Gudimchuk N., Roll-Mecak A. α-Tubulin Tail Modifications Regulate Microtubule Stability through Selective Effector Recruitment, not Changes in Intrinsic Polymer Dynamics. Dev. Cell. 2021;56:2016–2028.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.05.005
  10. Mahalingan K.K., Grotjahn D.A., Li Y., Lander G.C., Zehr E.A., Roll-Mecak A. Structural Basis for α-Tubulin-Specific and Modification State-Dependent Glutamylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2024;20:1493–1504. doi: 10.1038/s41589-024-01599-0
  11. Bigman L.S., Levy Y. Modulating Microtubules: A Molecular Perspective on the Effects of Tail Modifications. J. Mol. Biol. 2021;433:166988. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166988
  12. LaFrance B.J., Roostalu J., Henkin G., Greber B.J., Zhang R., Normanno D., McCollum C.O., Surrey T., Nogales E. Structural Transitions in the GTP Cap Visualized by Cryo-Electron Microscopy of Catalytically Inactive Microtubules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114994119
  13. Webb B., Sali A. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 2016;54. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.3
  14. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.5 Schrödinger, LLC. https://www.pymol.org (accessed 23.11.2024).
  15. Olsson M.H.M., Søndergaard C.R., Rostkowski M., Jensen J.H. PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7:525–537. doi: 10.1021/ct100578z
  16. Morozenko A., Stuchebrukhov A.A. Dowser++, a New Method of Hydrating Protein Structures. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2016;84:1347–1357. doi: 10.1002/prot.25081
  17. Mackerell A.D., Feig M., Brooks C.L. Extending the Treatment of Backbone Energetics in Protein Force Fields: Limitations of Gas-Phase Quantum Mechanics in Reproducing Protein Conformational Distributions in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1400–1415. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20065
  18. Huang J., Rauscher S., Nawrocki G., Ran T., Feig M., de Groot B.L., Grubmüller H., MacKerell A.D. CHARMM36m: An Improved Force Field for Folded and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:71–73. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4067
  19. Abraham M.J., Murtola T., Schulz R., Páll S., Smith J.C., Hess B., Lindahl E. GROMACS: High Performance Molecular Simulations through Multi-Level Parallelism from Laptops to Supercomputers. SoftwareX. 2015;1–2:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
  20. Fedorov V.A., Kovalenko I.B. The Impact of a Catalytic Site Mutation on the Shape and Mechanics of Tubulin Protofilaments. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2024;19(2):393–401. doi: 10.17537/2024.19.393
  21. Parrinello M., Rahman A. Polymorphic Transitions in Single Crystals: A New Molecular Dynamics Method. J. Appl. Phys. 1981;52:7182–7190. doi: 10.1063/1.328693
  22. Essmann U., Perera L., Berkowitz M.L., Darden T., Lee H., Pedersen, L.G. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995;103:8577–8593. doi: 10.1063/1.470117
Содержание Оригинальная статья
Холина Е.Г., Гудимчук Н.Б. Исследование эффектов полиглутамилирования С-концевых участков α-тубулина методом полноатомной молекулярной динамики. Математическая биология и биоинформатика. 2024;19(2):418-426. doi: 10.17537/2024.19.418
(опубликована на рус. яз.)

Аннотация (рус.)
Аннотация (англ.)
Полный текст (рус., pdf)
Список литературы

 

  Copyright ИМПБ РАН © 2005-2026