Russian version English version
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Information for Readers and Authors
Current Issue
Archive
Contact Us
Search

Send manuscript
 


Volume 20   Issue 2   Year 2025
References

  1. Elektroentsefalografiia (Electroencephalography): A Guide. Ed. Aleksandrov M.V. St. Petersburg, 2020. 224 p. (in Russ.).
  2. Tatum U.O., Khusein A.M., Bendbadis S.R., Kaplan P.V. Klinicheskaia interpretatsiia elektroentsefalografii (Clinical interpretation of electroencephalography). Moscow, 2025. 264 p. (in Russ.).
  3. Gnezditskii V.V. Obratnaia zadacha EEG i klinicheskaia elektroentsefalografiia (Inverse EEG problem and clinical electroencephalography). 2004. 624 p. (in Russ.).
  4. Fuchs M., Wagner M., Kastner J. Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction. Clin. Neurophysiology. 2001;112:1400–1407. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00589-2
  5. Hämaälaäinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography – Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993;65(2):413–497. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413
  6. Llinás R.R., Ribary U., Jeanmonod D., Kronberg E., Mitra P.P. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: A neurological and neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by magnetoencephalography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96(26):15222–15227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15222
  7. Magnetism in medicine: a handbook. Eds. Andra W., Nowak H. Wiley-VCH, 2007. 630 p.
  8. Baillet S. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nature Neuroscience. 2017;20(3):327–339. doi: 10.1038/nn.4504
  9. Handbook of EEG Interpretation. Ed. Tatum IV W.O. Springer Publishing, 2021 doi: 10.1891/9780826147097
  10. Frigo M., Johnson S.G. The Design and Implementation of FFTW3. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2005;93(2):216–231. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2004.840301
  11. Ustinin M., Boyko A., Rykunov S. Healthy aging changes in conventional frequency bands of neuroelectric brain activity reconstructed from resting-state MEG. Geroscience. 2025;47(3):4093–4108. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01522-y
  12. Little S., Bonaiuto J., Meyer S.S., Lopez J., Bestmann S., Barnes G. Quantifying the performance of MEG source reconstruction using resting state data. Neuroimage. 2018;181:453–460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.030
  13. Hämäläinen M.S., Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1994;32(1):35–42. doi: 10.1007/BF02512476
  14. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology. 2002;24(Suppl D):5–12.
  15. Belardinelli P., Ortiz E., Barnes G., Noppeney U., Preissl H. Source reconstruction accuracy of MEG and EEG Bayesian inversion approaches. PLoS One. 2012;7(12). Article No. e51985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051985
  16. Friston K., Harrison L., Daunizeau J., Kiebel S., Phillips C., Trujillo-Barreto N., Henson R., Flandin G., Mattout J. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage. 2008;39(3):1104–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.048
  17. Llinás R.R., Ustinin M.N. Frequency-pattern functional tomography of magnetoencephalography data allows new approach to the study of human brain organization. Front. Neural Circuits. 2014;8. Article No. 43. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00043
  18. Llinás R.R., Ustinin M.N., Rykunov S.D., Boyko A.I., Sychev V.V., Walton K.D., Rabello G.M., Garcia J. Reconstruction of human brain spontaneous activity based on frequency-pattern analysis of magnetoencephalography data. Front. Neurosci. 2015;9. Article No. 373. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00373
  19. Ustinin, M.N., Boyko, A.I. & Rykunov, S.D. Functional Tomography of Complex Systems Using Spectral Analysis of Multichannel Measurement Data. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 2023;33:1344–1374. doi: 10.1134/S1054661823040491
  20. Llinás R.R., Rykunov S., Walton K.D., Boyko A., Ustinin M. Splitting of the magnetic encephalogram into «brain» and «non-brain» physiological signals based on the joint analysis of frequency-pattern functional tomograms and magnetic resonance images. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2022;16. Article No. 834434. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.834434
  21. Rykunov S.D., Boyko A.I., Ustinin M.N. Reconstruction of the Electrical Structure of the Human Body Using Spectral Functional Tomography. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 2023;33:1315–1343. doi: 10.1134/S1054661823040387
  22. Niso G., Rogers C., Moreau J.T., Chen L.Y., Madjar C., Das S., Bock E., Tadel F., Evans A., Jolicoeur P., Baillet S. OMEGA: The Open MEG Archive. Neuroimage. 2015;124:1182–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.028
  23. Coffey E.B.J., Herholz S.C., Scala S., Zatorre R.J. Montreal Music History Questionnaire: a tool for the assessment of music-related experience. In: The Neurosciences and Music IV: Learning and Memory Conference. Edinburgh, UK, 2011.
  24. Ustinin M.N., Sychev V.V., Walton K.D., Llinás R.R. New Methodology for the Analysis and Representation of Human Brain Function: MEGMRIAn. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2014;9(2):464–481. doi: 10.17537/2014.9.464
  25. McCubbin J., Vrba J., Spear P., McKenzie D., Willis R., Loewen R., Robinson S.E., Fife A.A. Advanced electronics for the CTF MEG system. Neurol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004;2004:69.
  26. Taulu S., Kajola M. Presentation of electromagnetic multichannel data: The signal space separation method. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;97(12). doi: 10.1063/1.1935742/893620
  27. Taulu S., Simola J. Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2006;51(7):1759–1768. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008
  28. Gramfort A., Luessi M., Larson E., Engemann D.A., Strohmeier D., Brodbeck C., Goj R., Jas M., Brooks T., Parkkonen L., Hämäläinen M. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Front. Neurosci. 2013;7. Article No. 267. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
  29. Frigo M., Johnson S.G. The Design and Implementation of FFTW3. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2005;93(2):216–231. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2004.840301
  30. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J.-M. FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2011;2011(1). Article No. 156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
  31. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 1987;32(1):11–22. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/32/1/004
  32. Rykunov S.D., Rykunova E.D., Boyko A.I., Ustinin M.N. VirtEl - Software for Magnetic Encephalography Data Analysis by the Method of Virtual Electrodes. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2019;14(1):340–354. doi: 10.17537/2019.14.340
  33. Rykunov S.D., Boyko A.I. Partial Spectroscopy of the Human Brain Based On the Joint Analysis of MEG and MRI Data. Application to the CamCAN Data Array. Ìàthematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2025;20(1):135–146. doi: 10.17537/2025.20.135
  34. Capilla A., Arana L., García-Huéscar M., Melcón M., Gross J., Campo P. The natural frequencies of the resting human brain: An MEG-based atlas. NeuroImage. 2022;258. Article No. 119373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119373
Table of Contents
Original Article
Rykunov S.D., Boyko A.I. Estimation of Spatial Distribution of the Main Rhythms of Human Brain Activity Using the Method of Functional Tomography Based on Magnetic Encephalography Data. Ìàthematical biology and bioinformatics. 2025;20(2):287-300. doi: 10.17537/2025.20.287
(published in Russian)

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References

 
  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2026