Russian version English version
Volume 20   Issue 2   Year 2025
References

  1. Theodorakopoulos N. Melting of genomic DNA: Predictive modeling by nonlinear lattice dynamics. Physical Review E. 2010;82. Article No. 021905. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021905
  2. Dauxois T., Peyrard M., Bishop A.R. Entropy-driven DNA denaturation. Physical Review E. 1993;47:R44–R47. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.R44
  3. Frank-Kamenetskii M.D., Prakash S. Fluctuations in the DNA double helix: A critical review. Physics of Life Reviews. 2014;11:153–170. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.01.005
  4. Poland D., Scheraga H.A. Occurrence of a phase transition in nucleic acid models. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1966;45:1464–1469. doi: 10.1063/1.1727786
  5. Kafri Y., Mukamel D., Peliti L. Why is the DNA Denaturation Transition First Order? Physical Review Letters. 2000;85:4988–4991. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4988
  6. Causo M.S., Coluzzi B., Grassberger P. Simple model for the DNA denaturation transition. Physical Review E. 2000;62:3958–3973. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3958
  7. Coluzzi B., Yeramian E. Numerical evidence for relevance of disorder in a Poland-Scheraga DNA denaturation model with self-avoidance: scaling behavior of average quantities. The European Physical Journal B. 2007;56:349–365. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00140-5
  8. Coluzzi B. Numerical study of a disordered model for DNA denaturation transition. Physical Review E. 2006;73. Article No. 011911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.011911
  9. Blossey R., Carlon E. Reparametrizing the loop entropy weights: Effect on DNA melting curves. Physical Review E. 2003;68. Article No. 061911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061911
  10. Baiesi M., Carlon E., Kafri Y., Mukamel D., Orlandini E., Stella A.L. Interstrand distance distribution of DNA near melting. Physical Review E. 2003;67. Article No. 021911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.021911
  11. Garel T., Monthus C. Numerical study of the disordered Poland–Scheraga model of DNA denaturation. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 2005;2005. Article No. P06004. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/06/P06004
  12. Campa A., Giansanti A. Experimental tests of the Peyrard-Bishop model applied to the melting of very short DNA chains. Physical Review E. 1998;58:3585–3588. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3585
  13. Hillebrand M., Kalosakas G., Schwellnus A., Skokos Ch. Heterogeneity and chaos in the Peyrard-Bishop-Dauxois DNA model. Physical Review E. 2019;99. Article No. 022213. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.022213
  14. Alexandrov B.S., Gelev V., Yoo S.W., Bishop A.R., Rasmussen K.Ø., Usheva A. Toward a Detailed Description of the Thermally Induced Dynamics of the Core Promoter. PLOS Computational Biology. 2009;5. Article No. e1000313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000313
  15. Kalosakas G., Ares S. Dependence on temperature and guanine-cytosine content of bubble length distributions in DNA. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2009;130. Article No. 235104. doi: 10.1063/1.3149859
  16. Ares S., Kalosakas G. Distribution of Bubble Lengths in DNA. Nano Letters. 2007;7:307–311. doi: 10.1021/nl062304a
  17. Alexandrov B.S., Wille L.T., Rasmussen K.O., Bishop A.R., Blagoev K.B. Bubble statistics and dynamics in double-stranded DNA. Physical review E. 2006;74. Article No. 050901(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.050901
  18. Kalosakas G., Rasmussen K.Ø., Bishop A.R. Non-exponential decay of base-pair opening fluctuations in DNA. Chemical Physics Letters. 2006;432:291–295. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.10.045
  19. van Erp T.S., Cuesta-Lopez S., Peyrard M. Bubbles and denaturation in DNA. European Physical Journal E. 2006;20:421–434. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2006-10032-2
  20. Ares S., Voulgarakis N.K., Rasmussen K.O., Bishop A.R. Bubble Nucleation and Cooperativity in DNA Melting. Physical Review Letters. 2005;94. Article No. 035504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.035504
  21. Baumann C.G., Smith S.B., Bloomfield V.A., Bustamante C. Ionic effects on the elasticity of single DNA molecules. PNAS USA. 1997;94:6185–6190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6185
  22. Kuznetsov S.V., Shen Y., Benight A.S., Ansari A. A semiflexible polymer model applied to loop formation in DNA hairpins. Biophysical Journal. 2001;81:2864–2875. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75927-9
  23. Theodorakopoulos, N. Bubbles, Clusters and Denaturation in Genomic DNA: Modeling, Parametrization, Efficient Computation. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics. 2011;18(Suppl. 2):429–447. doi: 10.1142/S1402925111001611
  24. Mills J.B., Vacano E., Hagerman P.J. Flexibility of single-stranded DNA: use of gapped duplex helices to determine the persistence lengths of Poly(dT) and Poly(dA). Journal of Molecular Biology. 1999;285:245–257. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2287
  25. Gueron M., Kochoyan M., Leroy J.L. A single mode of DNA base-pair opening drives imino proton exchange. Nature. 1987;328:89–92. doi: 10.1038/328089a0
  26. Shigaev A.S., Lakhno V.D. How to Rely Correctly on Experimental Data When Parameterizing Simple DNA Models. KIAM Preprint. 2025. No. 48. 17 p. EDN: JHXDVW. https://library.keldysh.ru/preprint.asp?id=2025-48 (accessed 01 September 2025).
  27. Shigaev A.S., Ponomarev O.A., Lakhno V.D. Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of DNA Open States. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2018;13:t162–t267. doi: 10.17537/2018.13.t162
Table of Contents Original Article
Shigaev A.S. Comment to “Melting of genomic DNA: Predictive modeling by nonlinear lattice dynamics”. The problem of entropy and end effects in the Peyard – Bishop – Dauxois model. Ìàthematical biology and bioinformatics. 2025;20(2):363-368. doi: 10.17537/2025.20.363
(published in Russian)

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References

 

  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2026