Russian version English version
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Information for Readers and Authors
Current Issue
Archive
Contact Us
Search

Send manuscript
 


Volume 20   Issue 2   Year 2025
References

  1. Uhlen M., Quake S.R. Sequential sequencing by synthesis and the next-generation sequencing revolution. Trends in Biotechnology. 2023;41(12):1565-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.06.007
  2. Szakállas N., Bartak B.K., Valcz G., Nagy Z.B., Takács I., Molnár B. Can long-read sequencing tackle the barriers, which the next-generation could not? A review. Pathology and Oncology Research. 2024;30. doi: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611676
  3. Pervez M.T., Hasnain M.J.u., Abbas S.H., Moustafa M.F., Aslam N., Shah S.S.M. [Retracted] A Comprehensive Review of Performance of Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms. BioMed Research International. 2022;2022(1). doi: 10.1155/2022/3457806
  4. Schloissnig S., Pani S., Rodriguez-Martin B., Ebler J., Hain C., Tsapalou V., Soylev A., Huther P., Ashraf H., Prodanov T., et al. Long-read sequencing and structural variant characterization in 1, 019 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project. bioRxiv. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.18.590093
  5. Lemay M., Sibbesen J.A., Torkamaneh D., Hamel J., Levesque R.C., Belzile F. Combined use of Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing yields insights into soybean structural variation biology. BMC Biology. 2022;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01255-w
  6. Dyshlovoy S.A., Paigin S., Afflerbach A., Lobermeyer A., Werner S., Schuller U., Bokemeyer C., Schuh A.H., Bergmann L., von Amsberg G., et al. Applications of Nanopore sequencing in precision cancer medicine. International Journal of Cancer. 2024;155(12):2129-2140. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35100
  7. Scarano C., Veneruso I., De Simone R.R., Di Bonito G., Secondino A., D’Argenio V. The Third-Generation Sequencing Challenge: Novel Insights for the Omic Sciences. Biomolecules. 2024;14(5):568. doi: 10.3390/biom14050568
  8. Zhang T., Li H., Jiang M., Hou H., Gao Y., Li Y., Wang F., Wang J., Peng K., Liu Y. Nanopore sequencing: flourishing in its teenage years. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2024;51(12):1361-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2024.09.007
  9. Ermini L., Driguez P. The Application of Long-Read Sequencing to Cancer. Cancers. 2024;16(7):1275. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071275
  10. Zhang J., Yang T., Xie Z., Ren Z., Shi L., Yan J., Ni M. Rapid sequencing and identification for 18-STRs long amplicon panel using portable devices and nanopore sequencer. Genomics. 2025;117(1):110970. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2024.110970
  11. Park S.Y., Faraci G., Ganesh K., Dubé M.P., Lee H.Y. Portable Nanopore sequencing solution for next-generation HIV drug resistance testing. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2024;171:105639. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105639
  12. Delahaye C., Nicolas J. Sequencing DNA with nanopores: Troubles and biases. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0257521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257521
  13. Magi A., Semeraro R., Mingrino A., Giusti B., D’Aurizio R. Nanopore sequencing data analysis: state of the art, applications and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2017. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx062
  14. Hardwick S.A., Deveson I.W., Mercer T.R. Reference standards for next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2017;18(8):473-484. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.44
  15. Gargis A.S., Kalman L., Bick D.P., da Silva C., Dimmock D.P., Funke B.H., Gowrisankar S., Hegde M.R., Kulkarni S., Mason C.E., et al. Good laboratory practice for clinical next-generation sequencing informatics pipelines. Nature Biotechnology. 2015;33(7):689-693. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3237
  16. Endrullat C., Glokler J., Franke P., Frohme M. Standardization and quality management in next-generation sequencing. Applied & Translational Genomics. 2016;10:2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2016.06.001
  17. Espinosa E., Bautista R., Larrosa R., Plata O. Advancements in long-read genome sequencing technologies and algorithms. Genomics. 2024;116(3):110842. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2024.110842
  18. Kim C., Pongpanich M., Porntaveetus T. Unraveling metagenomics through long-read sequencing: a comprehensive review. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2024;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04917-1
  19. Genner R., Akeson S., Meredith M., Jerez P.A., Malik L., Baker B., Miano-Burkhardt A., Paten B., Billingsley K.J., Blauwendraat C., et al. Assessing methylation detection for primary human tissue using Nanopore sequencing. bioRxiv. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.29.581569
  20. De Coster W., Weissensteiner M.H., Sedlazeck F.J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2021;22(9):572-587. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00367-3
  21. Nicholls S.M., Quick J.C., Tang S., Loman N.J. Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards. GigaScience. 2019;8(5). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz043
  22. Koranne S. Hierarchical Data Format 5 : HDF5. 2010:191-200. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7719-9_10
  23. GitHub - nanoporetech/pod5-file-format: Pod5: a high performance file format for nanopore reads. - github.com. https://github.com/nanoporetech/pod5-file-format (accessed 24.10.2025).
  24. Liu Y., Rosikiewicz W., Pan Z., Jillette N., Wang P., Taghbalout A., Foox J., Mason C., Carroll M., Cheng A., et al. DNA methylation-calling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing: a survey and human epigenome-wide evaluation. Genome Biology. 2021;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02510-z
  25. Pagès-Gallego M., van Soest D.M.K., Besselink N.J.M., Straver R., Keijer J.P., Vermeulen C., Marcozzi A., van Roosmalen M.J., van Boxtel R., Burgering B.M.T., et al. Direct detection of 8-oxo-dG using nanopore sequencing. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.17.594638
  26. Schreiber J., Karplus K. Analysis of nanopore data using hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(12):1897-1903. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv046
  27. David M., Dursi L.J., Yao D., Boutros P.C., Simpson J.T. Nanocall: an open source basecaller for Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2016;33(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw569
  28. Wick R., Judd L.M., Holt K.E. Comparison Of Oxford Nanopore Basecalling Tools. 2018. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1188469
  29. Graves A. Connectionist Temporal Classification. 2012:61-93. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2_7
  30. Wick R., Judd L.M., Holt K.E. Comparison Of Oxford Nanopore Basecalling Tools. 2018. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1188469
  31. GitHub - nanoporetech/flappie: Flip-flop basecaller for Oxford Nanopore reads - github.com. https://github.com/nanoporetech/flappie (accessed 24.10.2025).
  32. Schuster M., Paliwal K. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 1997;45(11):2673-2681. doi: 10.1109/78.650093
  33. Xu Z., Mai Y., Liu D., He W., Lin X., Xu C., Zhang L., Meng X., Mafofo J., Zaher W.A., et al. Fast-bonito: A faster deep learning based basecaller for nanopore sequencing. Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences. 2021;1:100011. doi: 10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100011
  34. Technologies O.N. Dorado: A resource-efficient basecaller with an advanced decoding algorithm. https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado (accessed 24.10.2025).
  35. Ahsan M.U., Gouru A., Chan J., Zhou W., Wang K. A signal processing and deep learning framework for methylation detection using Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Nature Communications. 2024;15(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45778-y
  36. Ni P., Huang N., Zhang Z., Wang D., Liang F., Miao Y., Xiao C., Luo F., Wang J. DeepSignal: detecting DNA methylation state from Nanopore sequencing reads using deep-learning. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(22):4586-4595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz276
  37. Tourancheau A., Mead E.A., Zhang X., Fang G. Discovering multiple types of DNA methylation from bacteria and microbiome using nanopore sequencing. Nature Methods. 2021;18(5):491-498. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01109-3
  38. Sergeev A.V., Malyshev D.P., Genatullina A.I., Pavlova G.V., Gromova E.S., Zvereva M.I. Single-Molecule Nanopore Sequencing of the CpG Island from the Promoter of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Provides Insights into the Mechanism of De Novo Methylation of G/C-Rich Regions. Epigenomes. 2025;9(1):4. doi: 10.3390/epigenomes9010004
  39. Pagès-Gallego M., van Soest D.M.K., Besselink N.J.M., Straver R., Keijer J.P., Vermeulen C., Marcozzi A., van Roosmalen M.J., van Boxtel R., Burgering B.M.T., et al. Direct detection of 8-oxo-dG using nanopore sequencing. Nature Communications. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60391-3
  40. GitHub - nanoporetech/remora: Methylation/modified base calling separated from basecalling. - github.com. https://github.com/nanoporetech/remora (accessed 24.10.2025).
  41. Ewing B., Hillier L., Wendl M.C., Green P. Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment. Genome Research. 1998;8(3):175-185. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.175
  42. White R., Pellefigues C., Ronchese F., Lamiable O., Eccles D. Investigation of chimeric reads using the MinION. F1000Research. 2017;6:631. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11547.2
  43. De Coster W., Rademakers R. NanoPack2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(5). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad311
  44. Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one {FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884-i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
  45. Babraham Bioinformatics - FastQC A Quality Control tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed 24.10.2025).
  46. Babraham Bioinformatics - FastQ Screen. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastq_screen/ (accessed 24.10.2025).
  47. Ewels P., Magnusson M., Lundin S., Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047-3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
  48. Li Z., Chen Y., Mu D., Yuan J., Shi Y., Zhang H., Gan J., Li N., Hu X., Liu B., et al. Comparison of the two major classes of assembly algorithms: overlap-layout-consensus and de-bruijn-graph. Briefings in Functional Genomics. 2011;11(1):25-37. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elr035
  49. Huson D.H., Reinert K., Myers E.W. The greedy path-merging algorithm for contig scaffolding. Journal of the ACM. 2002;49(5):603-615. doi: 10.1145/585265.585267
  50. Sohn J., Nam J. The present and future ofde novowhole-genome assembly. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2016. P. bbw096. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw096
  51. Miller J.R., Koren S., Sutton G. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics. 2010;95(6):315-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001
  52. Cherukuri Y., Janga S.C. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(S7). doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2895-8
  53. Cosma B., Shirali Hossein Zade R., Jordan E.N., van Lent P., Peng C., Pillay S., Abeel T. Evaluating long-read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes: insights and considerations. Gigascience. 2022;12. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giad100
  54. Kolmogorov M., Yuan J., Lin Y., Pevzner P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):540-546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8
  55. Li H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(14):2103-2110. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152
  56. Koren S., Walenz B.P., Berlin K., Miller J.R., Bergman N.H., Phillippy A.M. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptivek-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Research. 2017;27(5):722-736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116
  57. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094-3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
  58. Sedlazeck F.J., Rescheneder P., Smolka M., Fang H., Nattestad M., von Haeseler A., Schatz M.C. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nature Methods. 2018;15(6):461-468. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0001-7
  59. Sović I., Šikić M., Wilm A., Fenlon S.N., Chen S., Nagarajan N. Fast and sensitive mapping of nanopore sequencing reads with GraphMap. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1). doi: 10.1038/ncomms11307
  60. Suzuki H., Kasahara M. Introducing difference recurrence relations for faster semi-global alignment of long sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(S1). doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2014-8
  61. Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(5):589-595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
  62. Camacho C., Coulouris G., Avagyan V., Ma N., Papadopoulos J., Bealer K., Madden T.L. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
  63. Walker B.J., Abeel T., Shea T., Priest M., Abouelliel A., Sakthikumar S., Cuomo C.A., Zeng Q., Wortman J., Young S.K., et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
  64. Lee J.Y., Kong M., Oh J., Lim J., Chung S.H., Kim J., Kim J., Kim K., Yoo J., Kwak W. Comparative evaluation of Nanopore polishing tools for microbial genome assembly and polishing strategies for downstream analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00178-w
  65. GitHub - nanoporetech/medaka: Sequence correction provided by ONT Research. https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka (accessed 24.10.2025).
  66. Rhie A., Walenz B.P., Koren S., Phillippy A.M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biology. 2020;21(1). doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9
  67. Chen Y., Zhang Y., Wang A.Y., Gao M., Chong Z. Accurate long-read de novo assembly evaluation with Inspector. Genome Biology. 2021;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02527-4
  68. Mapleson D., Garcia Accinelli G., Kettleborough G., Wright J., Clavijo B.J. KAT: a K-mer analysis toolkit to quality control NGS datasets and genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2016;33(4):574-576. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw663
  69. Tran Q., Phan V. Assembling Reads Improves Taxonomic Classification of Species. Genes. 2020;11(8):946. doi: 10.3390/genes11080946
  70. Wood D.E., Salzberg S.L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15(3):1-12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46
  71. Wood D.E., Lu J., Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0
  72. Kim D., Song L., Breitwieser F.P., Salzberg S.L. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res. 2016;26(12):1721-1729. doi: 10.1101/gr.210641.116
  73. Menzel P., Ng K.L., Krogh A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11257. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11257
  74. Johnson M., Zaretskaya I., Raytselis Y., Merezhuk Y., McGinnis S., Madden T.L. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(suppl_2):W5-W9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn201
  75. Blanco-Míguez A., Beghini F., Cumbo F., McIver L.J., Thompson K.N., Zolfo M., Manghi P., Dubois L., Huang K.D., Thomas A.M., et al. Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023;41(11):1633-1644. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01688-w
  76. Buchfink B., Reuter K., Drost H. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods. 2021;18(4):366-368. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x
  77. Huson D.H., Auch A.F., Qi J., Schuster S.C. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 2007;17(3):377-386. doi: 10.1101/gr.5969107
  78. Pruitt K.D., Tatusova T., Brown G.R., Maglott D.R. NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;40(D1):D130-D135. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1079
  79. Marcais G., Kingsford C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(6):764-770. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011
  80. Hantze H., Horton P. Effects of spaced k-mers on alignment-free genotyping. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(Supplement_1):i213-i221. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad202
  81. Karlsson F.H., Fåk F., Nookaew I., Tremaroli V., Fagerberg B., Petranovic D., B"{ackhed F., Nielsen J. Symptomatic atherosclerosis is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Nature Communications. 2012;3(1). doi: 10.1038/ncomms2266
  82. Curry K.D., Wang Q., Nute M.G., Tyshaieva A., Reeves E., Soriano S., Wu Q., Graeber E., Finzer P., Mendling W., et al. Emu: species-level microbial community profiling of full-length 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Nature Methods. 2022;19(7):845-853. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01520-4
  83. Kang D.D., Li F., Kirton E., Thomas A., Egan R., An H., Wang Z. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7. P. e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359
  84. Wu Y., Simmons B.A., Singer S.W. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2015;32(4):605-607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638
  85. Bailey T.L., Boden M., Buske F.A., Frith M., Grant C.E., Clementi L., Ren J., Li W.W., Noble W.S. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37(Web Server):W202-W208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335
  86. GitHub - nanoporetech/modkit: A bioinformatics tool for working with modified bases - github.com. https://github.com/nanoporetech/modkit (accessed 24.10.2025).
  87. Aleksander S.A., Balhoff J., Carbon S., Cherry J.M., Drabkin H.J., Ebert D., Feuermann M., Gaudet P., Harris N.L., Hill D.P., et al. The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023. GENETICS. 2023;224(1). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad031
  88. Stanke M., Keller O., Gunduz I., Hayes A., Waack S., Morgenstern B. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Research. 2006;34(Web Server):W435-W439. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200
  89. Sigrist C.J.A., de Castro E., Cerutti L., Cuche B.A., Hulo N., Bridge A., Bougueleret L., Xenarios I. New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;41(D1):D344-D347. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1067
  90. Hyatt D., Chen G., LoCascio P.F., Land M.L., Larimer F.W., Hauser L.J. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119
  91. Behboudi R., Nouri-Baygi M., Naghibzadeh M. RPTRF: A rapid perfect tandem repeat finder tool for DNA sequences. Biosystems. 2023;226:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104869
  92. Ryan C.P. Tandem repeat disorders. Evol. Med. Public Health. 2019;2019(1):17. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoz005
  93. Fan H., Chu J. A brief review of short tandem repeat mutation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2007;5(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60009-6
  94. Wyner N., Barash M., McNevin D. Forensic autosomal short tandem repeats and their potential association with phenotype. Front. Genet. 2020;11:884. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00884
  95. Dong X., Strous M. An integrated pipeline for annotation and visualization of metagenomic contigs. Front. Genet. 2019;10:999. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00999
  96. Wheeler T.J., Eddy S.R. nhmmer: DNA homology search with profile HMMs. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(19):2487-2489. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt403
  97. Ontiveros-Palacios N., Cooke E., Nawrocki E.P., Triebel S., Marz M., Rivas E., Griffiths-Jones S., Petrov A.I., Bateman A., Sweeney B. Rfam 15: RNA families database in 2025. Nucleic Acids Research. 2024;53(D1): D258-D267. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1023
  98. Finn R.D., Clements J., Eddy S.R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39(suppl.):W29-W37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367
  99. Glockner F.O. The SILVA Database Project: An ELIXIR core data resource for high-quality ribosomal RNA sequences. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 2019;3. doi: 10.3897/biss.3.36125
Table of Contents
Original Article
Eremin A.A., Sergeev A.V., Zvereva M.E., Khrenova M.G. Tools and Algorithms for Nanopore Sequencing Data Analysis in Genomics, Metagenomics, and Epigenomics. Ìàthematical biology and bioinformatics. 2025;20(2):588-624. doi: 10.17537/2025.20.588
(published in Russian)

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References

 
  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2026