Russian version English version
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Information for Readers and Authors
Current Issue
Archive
Contact Us
Search

Send manuscript
 


Volume 21   Issue 1   Year 2026
References

  1. Pržulj N., Malod-Dognin N. Simplicity within biological complexity. Bioinform. Adv. 2025;5(1). Article No. vbae164. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae164
  2. Panditrao G., Bhowmick R., Meena C., Sarkar R.R. Emerging landscape of molecular interaction networks: Opportunities, challenges and prospects. J. Biosci. 2022;47(2). Article No. 24. doi: 10.1007/s12038-022-00253-y
  3. Gysi D.M., Nowick K. Construction, comparison and evolution of networks in life sciences and other disciplines. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2020;17(166). Article No. 20190610. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0610
  4. Kivelä M., Arenas A., Barthelemy M., Gleeson J.P., Moreno Y., Porter M.A. Multilayer networks. J. Complex. Netw. 2014;2(3):203–71. doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnu016
  5. Nicosia V., Bianconi G., Latora V., Barthelemy M. Growing multiplex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111(5). Article No. 058701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.058701
  6. Wang W., Meng J., Li H., Fan J. Non-negative matrix factorization for overlapping community detection in directed weighted networks with sparse constraints. Chaos. 2023;33(5). Article No. 053111. doi: 10.1063/5.0152280
  7. Palla G., Derényi I., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature. 2005;435(7043):814–818. doi: 10.1038/nature03607
  8. Yan W., Hu G. Structural biology meets biomolecular networks: The Post-AlphaFold Era. Current Bioinformatics. 2022;17(6). doi: 10.2174/1574893617666220211115211
  9. Zheng H., Fu X., Shao J., Tang Y., Yu M., Li L., Huang L., Tang K. Transcriptional regulatory network of high-value active ingredients in medicinal plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2023;28(4):429–446. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.12.007
  10. Fradera-Sola A., Nischwitz E., Bayer M.E., Luck K., Butter F. RNA-dependent interactome allows network-based assignment of RNA-binding protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(10):5162–5176. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad245
  11. Papenfort K., Melamed S. Small RNAs, large networks: posttranscriptional regulons in gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2023;77:23–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041320-025836
  12. Zhang H., Feng Z., Wu C. Refining protein interaction network for identifying essential proteins. Current Bioinformatics. 2023;18(3):255–265. doi: 10.2174/1574893618666230217140446
  13. Meng X., Li W., Xiang J., Bedru H.D. Temporal-spatial analysis of the essentiality of hub proteins in protein-protein interaction networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2022;9(5):3504–3514. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2022.3185717
  14. Banos D.T., Trébulle P., Elati M. Integrating transcriptional activity in genome-scale models of metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol. 2017;11(7). Article No. 134. doi: 10.1186/s12918-017-0507-0
  15. Soh K.C., Miskovic L., Hatzimanikatis V. From network models to network responses: integration of thermodynamic and kinetic properties of yeast genome-scale metabolic networks. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12:129–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00771.x
  16. Grüning N.M., Lehrach H., Ralser M. Regulatory crosstalk of the metabolic network. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010;35(4):220–227. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.12.001
  17. Kauffman S.A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 1969;22(3):437–467. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90015-0
  18. Zhou Z., Liu Y., Feng Y., Klepin S., Tsimring L.S., Pillus L., Hasty J., Hao N. Engineering longevity-design of a synthetic gene oscillator to slow cell aging. Science. 2023;380(6643):376–381. doi: 10.1126/science.add7631
  19. Brophy J.A.N., Magallon K.J., Duan L., Zhong V. Synthetic genetic circuits as a means of reprogramming plant roots. Science. 2022;377(6607):747–751. doi: 10.1126/science.abo4326
  20. Hummel N.F.C., Zhou A., Li B., Markel K., Ornelas I.J., Shih P.M. The trans-regulatory landscape of gene networks in plants. Cell Syst. 2023;14(6). Article No. 501–511.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.05.002
  21. Akberdin I.R., Vertyshev A.Yu., Pintus S.S., Popov D.V., Kolpakov F.A. A mathematical model linking Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway and gene expression regulation in human skeletal muscle. Ìàthematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2020;15(1):20-39. doi: 10.17537/2020.15.20
  22. Costanzo M., Kuzmin E., van Leeuwen J., Mair B., Moffat J., Boone C., Andrews B. Global genetic networks and the genotype-to-phenotype relationship. Cell. 2019;177(1):85–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.033
  23. Martinez-Pastor M., Tonner P.D., Darnell C.L., Schmid A.K. Transcriptional regulation in Archaea: from individual genes to global regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2017;51:143–170. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-023413
  24. Borriello E., Walker S.I., Laubichler M.D. Cell phenotypes as macrostates of the GRN dynamics. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2020;334(4):213–224. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22938
  25. Roy S., Kundu T.K. Gene regulatory networks and epigenetic modifications in cell differentiation. IUBMB Life. 2014;66(2):100–109. doi: 10.1002/iub.1249
  26. Nazarieh M., Wiese A., Will T., Hamed M., Helms V. Identification of key player genes in gene regulatory networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2016;10(1). Article No. 88. doi: 10.1186/s12918-016-0329-5
  27. Bakhteh S., Ghaffari-Hadigheh A., Chaparzadeh N. Identification of minimum set of master regulatory genes in gene regulatory networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2020;17(3):999-1009. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2875692
  28. Liu Y.Y., Slotine J.J., and Barabási A.L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature. 2011;473(7346):167–173. doi: 10.1038/nature10011
  29. Moreno-Gámez S., Hochberg M.E., van Doorn G.S. Quorum sensing as a mechanism to harness the wisdom of the crowds. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1). Article No. 3415. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37950-7
  30. Efremenko E., Senko O., Stepanov N., Aslanli A., Maslova O., Lyagin I. Quorum sensing as a trigger that improves characteristics of microbial biocatalysts. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6). Article No. 1395. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061395
  31. Espina J.A., Cordeiro M.H., Barriga E.H. Tissue interplay during morphogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023;147:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.03.010
  32. Stapornwongkul K.S., Vincent J.P. Generation of extracell morphogen gradients: the case for diffusion. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22(6):393–411. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00342-y
  33. Gorfinkiel N., Martinez-Arias A. The cell in the age of the genomic revolution: Cell Regulatory Networks. Cells Dev. 2021;168. Article No. 203720. doi: 10.1016/j.cdev.2021.203720
  34. Paton V., Türei D., Ivanova O., Müller-Dott S., Rodriguez-Mier P., Venafra V., Perfetto L., Garrido-Rodriguez M., Saez-Rodriguez J. NetworkCommons: bridging data, knowledge, and methods to build and evaluate context-specific biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2025;41(2). Article No. btaf048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf048
  35. Kolpakov F., Akberdin I., Kiselev I., Kolmykov S., Kondrakhin Y., Kulyashov M., Kutumova E., Pintus S., Ryabova A., Sharipov R. et al. BioUML-towards a universal research platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(W1):W124–W131. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac286
  36. Kolmykov S., Yevshin I., Kulyashov M., Sharipov R., Kondrakhin Y., Makeev V.J., Kulakovskiy I.V., Kel A., Kolpakov F. GTRD: an integrated view of transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D104-D111. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa105
  37. Le Novère N., Hucka M., Mi H., Moodie S., Schreiber F., Sorokin A., Demir E., Wegner K., Aladjem M.I., Wimalaratne S.M. et al. The systems biology graphical notation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27(8):735–741. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1558
  38. Bergmann F.T., Czauderna T., Dogrusoz U., Rougny A., Dräger A., Touré V., Mazein A., Blinov M.L., Luna A. Systems biology graphical notation markup language (SBGNML) version 0.3. J. Integr. Bioinform. 2020;17(2–3). Article No. 20200016. doi: 10.1515/jib-2020-0016
  39. Rougny A., Balaur I., Luna A., Mazein A. StonPy: a tool to parse and query collections of SBGN maps in a graph database. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(3). Article No. btad100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad100
  40. Noor M.S., Ferdous S., Salehi R., Gates H., Dey S., Raghunath V.S., Zargar M.R., Chowdhury R. Next-generation metabolic models informed by biomolecular simulations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2025;92. Article No. 103259. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103259
  41. Cao Y., Pi W., Lin C.Y., Munzner U., Ohtomo M., Akutsu T. Common attractors in multiple boolean networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2023;20(5):2862–2873. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2023.3268795
  42. Ren Y., Sarkar A., Veltri P., Ay A., Dobra A., Kahveci T. Pattern discovery in multilayer networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2022;19(2):741–752. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2021.3105001
  43. Lakhova T.N., Kazantsev F.V., Lashin S.A., Matushkin Y.G. The finding and researching algorithm for potentially oscillating enzymatic systems. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2021;25(3):318–330. doi: 10.18699/VJ21.035
  44. Tyson J.J., Laomettachit T., Kraikivski P. Modeling the dynamic behavior of biochemical regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 2019;462:514–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.11.034
  45. Keating S.M., Waltemath D., König M., Zhang F., Dräger A., Chaouiya C., Bergmann F.T., Finney A., Gillespie C.S., Helikar T. et al. SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2020;16(8). Article No. e9110. doi: 10.15252/msb.20199110
  46. Lashin S.A., Klimenko A.I., Mustafin Z.S., Kolchanov N.A., Matushkin Yu.G. HEC 2.0: improved simulation of the evolution of prokaryotic communities. Ìàthematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2014;9(2):585–596. doi: 10.17537/2014.9.585
  47. Tchuraev R.N. A new method for the analysis of the dynamics of the molecular genetic control systems. I. Description of the method of generalized threshold models. J. Theor. Biol. 1991;151(1):71–87. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80144-4
  48. Tchuraev R.N., Galimzyanov A.V. Gene and epigene networks: two levels in organizing the hereditary system. J. Theor. Biol. 2009;259(4):659–669. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.034
  49. Galimzyanov A.V. «GREENCE» technology for in silico analysis of gene network dynamics in individual cells of a clonal population. Biophysics. 2006;51(1):S66–S69. doi: 10.1134/S0006350906070141
  50. Galimzyanov A.V., Tchuraev R.N. Dynamic mechanism of phase variation in bacteria based on multistable gene regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 2022;549. Article No. 111212. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111212
  51. Galimzyanov A.V. In silico model of epigene network capable of generating and maintaining phenotypical heterogeneity of a bacterial population. Biomics. 2022;14(3):278–284. doi: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2022-25
  52. Galimzyanov A.V. On one algorithm for modeling passive transport in cell sets of arbitrary configuration. Proc. 4th BGRS. Novosibirsk, Russia, 2004;2:38–41. https://conf.icgbio.ru/bgrs2004/en/ (accessed 04 April 2025).
  53. Tanouchi Y., Pai A., Park H., Huang H., Stamatov R., Buchler N.E., You L. A noisy linear map underlies oscillations in cell size and gene expression in bacteria. Nature. 2015;523:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nature14562
  54. Dantzig G.B. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1963. doi: 10.1515/9781400884179
  55. OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML). Object Management Group, version 2.5, 2015. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/ (accessed 04 April 2025).
  56. Chen P.P. The entity-relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1976;1(1):9–36. doi: 10.1145/320434.320440
  57. Bruce T.A. Designing Quality Databases with IDEFIX Information Models. New York, NY, USA: Dorset House Publishing, 1992.
  58. Tchuraev R.N., Galimzyanov A.V. On parametric stability of gene networks controlling ontogenetic processes. Mol. Biol. 2003;37(1):81–88. doi: 10.1023/A:1022388930948
  59. Galimzyanov A.V., Tchuraev R.N. An investigation of the structural stability of Drosophila control gene subnetwork in computer experiments. In: Bioinformatics of Genome Regulation and Structure. Ed. Kolchanov N., Hofestaedt R. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2004. P. 301–309. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7152-4_32
  60. Tchuraev R.N., Stupak I.V., Stupak E.E., Galimzyanov A.V. A new epigene property: metastable epigenotypes. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2006;406:97–99. doi: 10.1134/S0012496606010285
  61. Peter I.S. The function of architecture and logic in developmental gene regulatory networks. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2020;139:267–295. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.04.001
  62. Wolpert L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cell differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 1969;25(1):1–47. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(69)80016-0
  63. Vadde B.V.L., Roeder A.H.K. Can the French flag and reaction-diffusion models explain flower patterning? Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the French flag model. J. Exp. Bot. 2020;71(10):2886–2897. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa065
  64. Reinitz J., Vakulenko S., Sudakow I., Grigoriev D. Robust morphogenesis by chaotic dynamics. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1). Article No. 7482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34041-x
  65. Jaeger J. The gap gene network. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011;68:243–274. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0536-y
  66. Cifuentes-Fontanals L., Tonello E., Siebert H. Node and edge control strategy identification via trap spaces in Boolean networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2025;24(1). Article No. 494. doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06135-y
  67. Swain M.T., Mande, J.J., Dubitzky W. Comparative study of three commonly used continuous deterministic methods for modeling gene regulation networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11. Article No. 459. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-459
  68. Mestl T., Plahte E., Omholt S.W. A mathematical framework for describing and analysing gene regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 1995;176:291–300. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0199
  69. Figueiredo D, Martins MA, Chaves M. Applying differential dynamic logic to reconfigurable biological networks. Math. Biosci. 2017;291:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.05.012
  70. Le Novère N. Quantitative and logic modelling of molecular and gene networks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015;16(3):146-158. doi: 10.1038/nrg3885
  71. Galimzyanov A.V., Stupak E.E., Tchuraev R.N. Epigene networks: theory, models, and experiment. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2019;9(6):484–490. doi: 10.1134/S2079086419060021
  72. Van Liedekerke P., Palm M.M., Jagiella N., Drasdo D. Simulating tissue mechanics with agent-based models: concepts, perspectives and some novel results. Comp. Part. Mech. 2015;2:401–444. doi: 10.1007/s40571-015-0082-3
  73. Metzcar J., Wang Y., Heiland R., Macklin P. A review of cell-based computational modeling in cancer biology. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 2019;3:1–13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00069
  74. Kondo S. An updated kernel-based Turing model for studying the mechanisms of biological pattern formation. J. Theor. Biol. 2017;414:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.11.003
  75. Deutsch A., Dormann S. Cell automaton modeling of biological pattern formation, characterization, examples, and analysis. New York: Springer, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7980-3
  76. Chopard B., Ouared R., Deutsch A., Hatzikirou H., Wolf-Gladrow D. Lattice-gas cell automaton models for biology: from fluids to cells. Acta Biotheor. 2010;58(4):329–340. doi: 10.1007/s10441-010-9118-5
  77. Nemati H., de Graaf J. The cell Potts model on disordered lattices. Soft Matter. 2024;20(42):8337–8352. doi: 10.1039/D4SM00445K
  78. Alert R., Trepat X. Physical models of collective cell migration. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2020;11:77–101. doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013516
  79. Alt S., Ganguly P., Salbreux G. Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2017;372. Article No. 20150520. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0520
  80. Swat M.H., Thomas G.L., Belmonte J.M., Shirinifard A., Hmeljak D., Glazier J.A. Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D. Methods Cell Biol. 2012;110:325–366. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-388403-9.00013-8
  81. Starruß J., de Back W., Brusch L., Deutsch A. Morpheus: a user-friendly modeling environment for multiscale and multicell systems biology. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1331–1332. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt772
  82. Wortel I.M., Textor J. Artistoo, a library to build, share, and explore simulations of cells and tissues in the web browser. eLife. 2021;10. Article No. e61288. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61288
  83. Daub J.T., Merks R.M.H. Cell-Based Computational Modeling of Vascular Morphogenesis Using Tissue Simulation Toolkit. In:  Vascular Morphogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology. V. 1214. Ed. Ribatti D.  New York: Humana Press, 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1462-3_6
  84. Mirams G.R., Arthurs C.J., Bernabeu M.O., Bordas R., Cooper J., Corrias A., Davit Y., Dunn S. J., Fletcher A. G., Harvey D. G. et al. Chaste: an open source C++ library for computational physiology and biology. PLoS Computational Biology. 2013;9(3). Article No. e1002970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002970
  85. Heiland R., Bergman D., Lyons B., Waldow G., Cass J., Lima da Rocha H., Ruscone M., Noël V., Macklin P. PhysiCell Studio: a graphical tool to make agent-based modeling more accessible. GigaByte. 2024. Article No. 2024:gigabyte128. doi: 10.46471/gigabyte.128
  86. Du J., Zhou Y., Jin L., Sheng K. Gell: A GPU-powered 3D hybrid simulator for large-scale multicell system. PLoS One. 2023;18(7). Article No. e0288721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288721
  87. Smart M., Zilman A. Emergent properties of collective gene expression patterns in multicell systems. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2023;4(101247). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2110.07170
Table of Contents
Original Article
Galimzyanov A.V. Modeling of Gene Networks and Cell Ensembles on the SETIES Platform. Ìàthematical biology and bioinformatics. 2026;21(1):43-79. doi: 10.17537/2026.21.43
(published in Russian)

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References

 
  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2026