Russian version English version
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Information for Readers and Authors
Current Issue
Archive
Contact Us
Search

Send manuscript
 


Volume 21   Issue 1   Year 2026
References

  1. Teshome D.T., Zharare G.E., Naidoo S. The threat of the combined effect of biotic and abiotic stress factors in forestry under a changing climate. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11. Article 601009. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.601009
  2. Toïgo M., Nicolas M., Jonard M., Croisé L., Nageleisen L.M., Jactel H. Temporal trends in tree defoliation and response to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses. Forest Ecology and Management. 2020;477. Article 118476. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118476
  3. Mitchell R.J., Bellamy P.E., Ellis C.J., Hewison R.L., Hodgetts N.G., Iason G.R., Littlewood N.A., Newey S., Stockan J., Taylor A.F.S. OakEcol: A database of Oak-associated biodiversity within the UK. Data in Brief. 2019;25. Article 104120. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104120
  4. Mölder A., Meyer P., Nagel R.V. Integrative management to sustain biodiversity and ecological continuity in Central European temperate oak (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) forests: An overview. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;437:324–339. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.006
  5. Fekete I., Berki I., Lajtha K., Béni Á., Móricz N., Várbíró G., Madarász B., Horváth T., Juhos K., Kotroczó Z. Changes in tree biomass and soil carbon pools of oak ecosystems along a climate gradient in a Central European region. Plant and Soil. 2025:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11104-025-07540-1
  6. Rodrigues A.R., Botequim B., Tavares C., Pécurto P., Borges J.G. Addressing soil protection concerns in forest ecosystem management under climate change. Forest Ecosystems. 2020;7(1). Article No. 34. doi: 10.1186/s40663-020-00247-y
  7. Verheyen K., Gillerot L., Blondeel H., De Frenne P., De Pauw K., Depauw L., Lorer E., Sanczuk P., Schreel J., Vanneste T., Wei L., Landuyt, D. Forest canopies as nature-based solutions to mitigate global change effects on people and nature. Journal of Ecology. 2024;112(11):2451–2461. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14345
  8. Gribbe S., Enderle L., Weigel R., Hertel D., Leuschner C., Muffler L. Recent growth decline and shifts in climatic growth constraints suggest climate vulnerability of beech, Douglas fir, pine and oak in Northern Germany. Forest Ecology and Management. 2024;566. Article No. 122022. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122022
  9. Barrès B., Dutech C., Saint-Jean G., Bodénès C., Burban C., Fiévet V., Lepoittevin C., Garnier-Géré P., Desprez-Loustau M.L. Demographic and genetic impacts of powdery mildew in a young oak (Quercus robur L.) cohort. Annals of Forest Science. 2024;81(1). Article No. 44. doi: 10.1186/s13595-024-01259-2
  10. Fernández I., Bouffaud M.L., Martínez-Medina A., Schädler M., Tarkka M.T., Weinhold A., van Dam N.M., Herrmann S., Buscot F. Endogenous rhythmic growth and ectomycorrhizal fungi modulate priming of antiherbivore defences in subsequently formed new leaves of oak trees. Journal of Ecology. 2025;113(6):1382–1396. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14263
  11. Le Provost G., Brachi B., Lesur I., Lalanne C., Labadie K., Aury J.M., Silva C., Postolache D., Leroy T., Plomion C. Gene expression and genetic divergence in oak species highlight adaptive genes to soil water constraints. Plant Physiology. 2022;190(4):2466–2483. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac420
  12. Tikhomirova T.S., Krutovsky K.V., Shestibratov K.A. Molecular Traits for Adaptation to Drought and Salt Stress in Birch, Oak and Poplar Species. Forests. 2023;14(1). Article No. 7. doi: 10.3390/f14010007
  13. Zybinskaya P.A., Tretyakova A.V., Krylov P.A. Spectral Evaluation of the Vital State of Quercus Robur L. Under Simulated Drought Conditions. Scientific Visualization. 2025;17. ¹1. doi: 10.26583/sv.17.1.04
  14. Krutovsky K.V., Popova A.A., Yakovlev I.A., Yanbaev Y.A., Matveev S.M. Response of Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) to Adverse Environmental Conditions in Genetic and Dendrochronological Studies. Plants (Basel). 2025;14(1). Article No. 109. doi: 10.3390/plants14010109
  15. Gailing O., Hipp A.L., Plomion C., Carlson J.E. Oak Population Genomics. 2021. In: Population Genomics. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/13836_2021_100
  16. Kersten B., Ghirardo A., Schnitzler J.P., Kanawati B., Schmitt-Kopplin P., Fladung M., Schroeder H. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics decipher differences in the resistance of pedunculate oak to the herbivore Tortrix viridana L. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1). Article No. 737. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-737
  17. Sanchez-Lucas R., Bosanquet J.L., Henderson J., Catoni M., Pastor V., Luna E. Elicitor specific mechanisms of defence priming in oak seedlings against powdery mildew. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2025;48(6):4455–4474. doi: 10.1111/pce.1549
  18. Madritsch S., Wischnitzki E., Kotrade P., Ashoub A., Burg A., Fluch S., Brüggemann W., Sehr E.M. Elucidating drought stress tolerance in European oaks through cross-species transcriptomics. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2019;9(10):3181–3199. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400456
  19. Kim D., Paggi J.M., Park C., Bennett C., Salzberg S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4
  20. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
  21. Liao Y., Smyth G.K., Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656
  22. Chen Y., Chen L., Lun A.T., Baldoni P.L., Smyth G.K. edgeR v4: powerful differential analysis of sequencing data with expanded functionality and improved support for small counts and larger datasets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2025;53(2). Article No. gkaf018. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf018
  23. Zheng Y., Jiao C., Sun H., Rosli H.G., Pombo M.A., Zhang P., Banf M., Dai X., Martin B.G., Giovannoni J.J., et al. iTAK: a program for genome-wide prediction and classification of plant transcription factors, transcriptional regulators, and protein kinases. Molecular Plant. 2016;9(12):1667–1670. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.09.014
  24. Cantalapiedra C.P., Hernández-Plaza A., Letunic I., Bork P., Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2021;38(12):5825–5829. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab293
  25. Huerta-Cepas J., Szklarczyk D., Heller D., Hernández-Plaza A., Forslund S.K., Cook H., Mende D.R., Letunic I., Rattei T., Bork P. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47(D1):D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085
  26. Langfelder P., Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
  27. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Wang J.T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
  28. Chin C.H., Chen S.H., Wu H.H., Ho C.W., Ko M.T., Lin C.Y. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Systems Biology. 2014;8. Article No. S11. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11
  29. Rau A., Marot G., Jaffrézic F. Differential meta-analysis of RNA-seq data from multiple studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(1). Article No. 91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-91
  30. Gugger P.F., Peñaloza-Ramírez J.M., Wright J.W., Sork V.L. Whole-transcriptome response to water stress in a California endemic oak, Quercus lobata. Tree Physiology. 2017;37(5):632–644. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw122
  31. Magalhães A.P., Verde N., Reis F., Martins I., Costa D., Lino-Neto T., Castro P.H., Tavares R.M., Azevedo H. RNA-Seq and gene network analysis uncover activation of an ABA-dependent signalosome during the cork oak root response to drought. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;6. Article No. 1195. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01195
  32. Maboreke H.R., Feldhahn L., Bönn M., Tarkka M.T., Buscot F., Herrmann S., Menzel R., Ruess L. Transcriptome analysis in oak uncovers a strong impact of endogenous rhythmic growth on the interaction with plant-parasitic nematodes. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1). Article No. 627. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2992-8
  33. Sevilla F., Camejo D., Ortiz-Espín A., Calderón A., Lázaro J.J., Jiménez A. The thioredoxin/peroxiredoxin/sulfiredoxin system: current overview on its redox function in plants and regulation by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66(10):2945–2955. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv146
  34. Kumari P., Gupta A., Yadav S. Thioredoxins as molecular players in plants, pests, and pathogens. In: Plant-Pest Interactions: From Molecular Mechanisms to Chemical Ecology: Chemical Ecology. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. P 107–125. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2467-7_6
  35. Sevilla F., Martí M.C., De Brasi-Velasco S., Jiménez A. Redox regulation, thioredoxins, and glutaredoxins in retrograde signalling and gene transcription. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2023;74(19):5955–5969. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad270
  36. De Brasi-Velasco S., Sánchez-Guerrero A., Castillo M.C., Vertommen D., León J., Sevilla F., Jiménez A. Thioredoxin TRXo1 is involved in ABA perception via PYR1 redox regulation. Redox Biology. 2023;63. Article No. 102750. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102750
  37. Sánchez-Guerrero A., Nadal M., Florez-Sarasa I., Ribas-Carbó M., Vallarino J.G., Brasi-Velasco S.D., Fernie A.R., Flexas J., Jiménez A., Sevilla F. Decreased levels of thioredoxin o1 influences stomatal development and aperture but not photosynthesis under non-stress and saline conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(3). Article No. 1063. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031063
  38. Talbert P.B., Henikoff S. Histone variants at a glance. Journal of Cell Science. 2021;134(6). Article No. jcs244749. doi: 10.1242/jcs.244749
  39. Gandhivel V.H.S., Sotelo-Parrilla P., Raju S., Jha S., Gireesh A., Harshith C.Y., Gut F., Vinothkumar K.R., Berger F., Jeyaprakash A.A., Shivaprasad P.V. An Oryza-specific histone H4 variant predisposes H4 lysine 5 acetylation to modulate salt stress responses. Nature Plants. 2025;11(4):790–807. doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-01974-2
  40. Liao H., Wu F., Xie J., He W., Zhang X., Dai J., Liu H., Li M., Wang L. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis elucidates transcriptional regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in differentially pigmented honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) varieties. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2025;16. Article No. 1636028. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1636028
  41. Liu W., Feng Y., Yu S., Fan Z., Li X., Li J., Yin H. The flavonoid biosynthesis network in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(23). Article No. 12824. doi: 10.3390/ijms222312824
  42. Aluko O.O., Ninkuu V., Jianpei Y., Chen S., Zeng H., Dakurah F.D. Phenylpropanoids metabolism: recent insight into stress tolerance and plant development cues. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2025;16. Article No. 1571825. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1571825
  43. Rao M.J., Zheng B. The role of polyphenols in abiotic stress tolerance and their antioxidant properties to scavenge reactive oxygen species and free radicals. Antioxidants. 2025;14(1). Article No. 74. doi: 10.3390/antiox14010074
  44. Chen G., Li D., Yao P., Chen F., Yuan J., Ma B., Yang Z., Ding B., He N. Metabolic and transcriptional analysis reveals flavonoid involvement in the drought stress response of mulberry leaves. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(13). Article No. 7417. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137417
  45. Hrmova M., Hussain S.S. Plant transcription factors involved in drought and associated stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(11). Article No. 5662. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115662
  46. Thilakarathne A.S., Liu F., Zou Z. Plant signaling hormones and transcription factors: key regulators of plant responses to growth, development, and stress. Plants. 2025;14(7). Article No. 1070. doi: 10.3390/plants14071070
  47. Müller N.A., Kersten B., Fladung M., Schroeder H. RNA-seq of eight different poplar clones reveals conserved up-regulation of gene expression in response to insect herbivory. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1). Article No. 673. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6048-8
  48. Zhao H., Jiang J., Li K., Liu G. Populus simonii × Populus nigra WRKY70 is involved in salt stress and leaf blight disease responses. Tree Physiology. 2017;37(6):827–844. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx020
  49. Xie Q., Dong W., Wang M., Wang J., Sun L., Liu Z., Gao C., Cao C. BpWRKY6 regulates insect resistance by affecting jasmonic acid and terpenoid synthesis in Betula platyphylla. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2025;23(9):3682–3696. doi: 10.1111/pbi.70169
  50. Lan L., Cao L., Zhang L., Fu W., Luo C., Wu C., Zeng X., Qu S., Yu X., Deng W., et al. A novel mode of WRKY1 regulating PR1-mediated immune balance to defend against powdery mildew in apple. Molecular Horticulture. 2025;5(1). Article No. 17. doi: 10.1186/s43897-024-00141-z
  51. Ambawat S., Sharma P., Yadav N.R., Yadav R.C. MYB transcription factor genes as regulators for plant responses: an overview. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2013;19(3):307–321. doi: 10.1007/s12298-013-0179-1
  52. Tian X., Zhang L., Feng S., Zhao Z., Wang X., Gao H. Transcriptome analysis of apple leaves in response to powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha) infection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(9). Article No. 2326. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092326
  53. Chezem W.R., Memon A., Li F.S., Weng J.K., Clay N.K. SG2-type R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB15 controls defense-induced lignification and basal immunity in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2017;29(8):1907–1926. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00954
  54. Su Z.L., Li A.M., Wang M., Qin C.X., Pan Y.Q., Liao F., Chen Z., Zhang B., Cai W., Huang D.L. The role of AP2/ERF transcription factors in plant responses to biotic stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025;26(10). Article No. 4921. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104921
  55. Reboledo G., Agorio A., Vignale L., Alvarez A., Ponce De León I. The moss-specific transcription factor PpERF24 positively modulates immunity against fungal pathogens in Physcomitrium patens. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13. Article No. 908682. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.908682
  56. Vranic M., Perochon A., Benbow H., Doohan F.M. Comprehensive analysis of pathogen-responsive wheat NAC transcription factors: new candidates for crop improvement. G3. 2022;12(11). Article No. jkac247. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac247
  57. Dong B., Liu Y., Huang G., Song A., Chen S., Jiang J., Chen F., Fang W. Plant NAC transcription factors in the battle against pathogens. BMC Plant Biology. 2024;24(1). Article No. 958. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05636-x
  58. Welner D.H., Lindemose S., Grossmann J.G., Møllegaard N.E., Olsen A.N., Helgstrand C., Skriver K., Lo Leggio L. DNA binding by the plant-specific NAC transcription factors in crystal and solution: a firm link to WRKY and GCM transcription factors. Biochemical Journal. 2012;444(3):395–404. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111742
  59. Shan W.E.I., Chen J.Y., Kuang J.F., Lu W.J. Banana fruit NAC transcription factor MaNAC5 cooperates with MaWRKYs to enhance the expression of pathogenesis-related genes against Colletotrichum musae. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2016;17(3):330–338. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12281
  60. Khan Y., Xiong Z., Zhang H., Liu S., Yaseen T., Hui T. Expression and roles of GRAS gene family in plant growth, signal transduction, biotic and abiotic stress resistance and symbiosis formation–a review. Plant Biology. 2022;24(3):404–416. doi: 10.1111/plb.13364
  61. Guan Y., Wang K., Zhao J., Miao X., Li X., Song P., Hu H., Zhang S., Li C. Genome-wide identification of TaeGRASs responsive to biotic stresses and functional analysis of TaeSCL6 in wheat resistance to powdery mildew. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1). Article No. 1149. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-11041-3
  62. Bao Y. Links between drought stress and autophagy in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2020;15(8). Article No. 1779487. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1779487
  63. Dong Y., Gupta S., Wargent J.J., Putterill J., Macknight R.C., Gechev T.S., Mueller-Roeber B., Dijkwel P.P. Comparative transcriptomics of multi-stress responses in Pachycladon cheesemanii and Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(14). Article No. 11323. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411323
  64. Duan Z., Chen K., Yang T., You R., Chen B., Li J., Liu L. Mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum protein homeostasis in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(24). Article No. 17599. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417599
  65. Liu J.X., Howell S.H. Managing the protein folding demands in the endoplasmic reticulum of plants. New Phytologist. 2016;211(2):418–428. doi: 10.1111/nph.13915
  66. Dai Vu L., Gevaert K., De Smet I. Protein language: post-translational modifications talking to each other. Trends in Plant Science. 2018;23(12):1068–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.09.004
  67. Shafiq M., Sadiq S., Ali Q., Haider M.S., Habib U., Ali D., Shahid M.A. Identification and characterization of Glycolate oxidase gene family in garden lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv.‘Salinas’) and its response under various biotic, abiotic, and developmental stresses. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1). Article No. 19686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47180-y
  68. Czarnocka W., Karpiński S. Friend or foe? Reactive oxygen species production, scavenging and signaling in plant response to environmental stresses. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2018;122:4–20. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.011
  69. Ibe C.N., Bailey S.L., Korolev A.V., Brett P., Saunders D.G. Isocitrate lyase promotes Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici susceptibility in wheat (Triticum aestivum) by suppressing accumulation of glyoxylate cycle intermediates. The Plant Journal. 2024;119(4):2033–2044. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16908
  70. Rojas C.M., Senthil-Kumar M., Tzin V., Mysore K.S. Regulation of primary plant metabolism during plant-pathogen interactions and its contribution to plant defense. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5. Article No. 17. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00017
  71. Zhang P., Li J., Gou X., Zhu L., Yang Y., Li Y., Zhang Y., Ding L., Ansabayeva A., Meng Y., Shan W. The Phytophthora infestans effector Pi05910 suppresses and destabilizes host glycolate oxidase StGOX4 to promote plant susceptibility. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2024;25(11). Article No. e70021. doi: 10.1111/mpp.70021
  72. Hettenhausen C., Schuman M.C., Wu J. MAPK signaling: a key element in plant defense response to insects. Insect Science. 2015;22(2):157–164. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12128
  73. Widemann E., Miesch L., Lugan R., Holder E., Heinrich C., Aubert Y., Miesch M., Pinot F., Heitz T. The amidohydrolases IAR3 and ILL6 contribute to jasmonoyl-isoleucine hormone turnover and generate 12-hydroxyjasmonic acid upon wounding in Arabidopsis leaves. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288(44):31701–31714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.499228
  74. Pastierovič F., Mogilicherla K., Hradecký J., Kalyniukova A., Dvořák O., Roy A., Tomášková I. Genome-wide transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses unveiling the defence mechanisms of Populus tremula against sucking and chewing insect herbivores. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(11). Article No. 6124. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116124
  75. Zhao Y., Sun T., Liu J., Zhang R., Yu Y., Zhou G., Liu J., Gao B. The key role of plant hormone signaling transduction and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways in the response of Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis) to feeding stimulation by pine caterpillar (Dendrolimus tabulaeformis). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(12). Article No. 6354. doi: 10.3390/ijms25126354
  76. Zhou S., Lou Y.R., Tzin V., Jander G. Alteration of plant primary metabolism in response to insect herbivory. Plant Physiology. 2015;169(3):1488–1498. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01405
  77. Ferreira M.A., Teixeira R.M., Brustolini O.J., Saia T.F., Jean-Baptiste J., Ribeiro N.G., Breves S.S., Sampaio F.R., Santos E.G., Leon B.A. et al. The immune NIK1/RPL10/LIMYB signaling module regulates photosynthesis and translation under biotic and abiotic stresses. Nature Communications. 2025;16(1). Article No. 4433. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59571-y
  78. Sanchez-Lucas R., Mayoral C., Raw M., Mousouraki M.A., Luna E. Elevated CO2 alters photosynthesis, growth and susceptibility to powdery mildew of oak seedlings. Biochemical Journal. 2023;480(17):1429–1443. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20230002
  79. Diao P., Chen C., Zhang Y., Meng Q., Lv W., Ma N. The role of NAC transcription factor in plant cold response. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2020;15(9). Article No. 1785668. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1785668
  80. Ma J., Yuan M., Sun B., Zhang D., Zhang J., Li C., Shao Y., Liu W., Jiang L. Evolutionary divergence and biased expression of NAC transcription factors in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants. 2021;10(2). Article No. 382. doi: 10.3390/plants10020382
  81. Guo F., Liu S., Zhang C., Dong T., Meng X., Zhu M. Genome-wide systematic survey and analysis of NAC transcription factor family and their response to abiotic stress in sweetpotato. Scientia Horticulturae. 2022;299. Article No. 111048. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111048
  82. Estravis-Barcala M., Mattera M. G., Soliani C., Bellora N., Opgenoorth L., Heer K., Arana M.V. Molecular bases of responses to abiotic stress in trees. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2020;71(13):3765–3779. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz532
  83. Duan M., Zhang R., Zhu F., Zhang Z., Gou L., Wen J., Dong J., Wang T. A lipid-anchored NAC transcription factor is translocated into the nucleus and activates glyoxalase I expression during drought stress. The Plant Cell. 2017;29(7):1748–1772. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00044
  84. Chen Y., Xia P. NAC transcription factors as biological macromolecules responded to abiotic stress: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2025;308. Article No. 142400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142400
  85. Hermann J.C., Marti-Arbona R., Fedorov A.A., Fedorov E., Almo S.C., Shoichet B.K., Raushel F. M. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function. Nature. 2007;448(7155):775–779.  doi: 10.1038/nature05981
  86. Zierer W., Hajirezaei M.R., Eggert K., Sauer N., von Wirén N., Pommerrenig B. Phloem-specific methionine recycling fuels polyamine biosynthesis in a sulfur-dependent manner and promotes flower and seed development. Plant Physiology. 2016;170(2):790–806. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00786
  87. Waduwara-Jayabahu I., Oppermann Y., Wirtz M., Hull Z.T., Schoor S., Plotnikov A.N., Hell R., Sauter M., Moffat B.F., Moffatt B.A. Recycling of methylthioadenosine is essential for normal vascular development and reproduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2012;158(4):1728–1744. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.191072
  88. Seo S.Y., Kim Y.J., Park K.Y. Increasing polyamine contents enhances the stress tolerance via reinforcement of antioxidative properties. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10. Article No. 1331. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01331
  89. Yi Q., Park M.J., Vo K.T.X., Jeon J.S. Polyamines in plant–pathogen interactions: roles in defense mechanisms and pathogenicity with applications in fungicide development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(20). Article No. 10927. doi: 10.3390/ijms252010927
  90. Gangurde S.S., Nayak S.N., Joshi P., Purohit S., Sudini H.K., Chitikineni A., Hong Y., Guo D., Chen X., Varshney R.K. Comparative transcriptome analysis identified candidate genes for late leaf spot resistance and cause of defoliation in groundnut. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(9). Article No. 4491. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094491
  91. Yin Y., Huang J., Xu Y. The cellulose synthase superfamily in fully sequenced plants and algae. BMC Plant Biology. 2009;9(1). Article No. 99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-99
  92. Amoroso C.G., D’Esposito D., Aiese Cigliano R., Ercolano M.R. Comparison of tomato transcriptomic profiles reveals overlapping patterns in abiotic and biotic stress responses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(4). Article No. 4061. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044061
  93. Mafa M.S., Rufetu E., Alexander O., Kemp G., Mohase L. Cell-wall structural carbohydrates reinforcements are part of the defence mechanisms of wheat against Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) infestation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2022;179:168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.018
  94. Li W., Wei J., Lei Y., Yang Z., Zhang S., Feng J., Li Y., Liu Y., Sheng H. Phosphorylation of cellulose synthases in plant responses to environmental changes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024. Article No. 139313. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.139313
  95. Perez-Alonso M.M., Talavera-Mateo L., Ojeda-Martinez D., Barcenilla-Valcárcel L., Montesinos Á., Garcia A., Frey C., Boter M., Martinez M., Diaz I., Santamaria M.E. The role of plant cell walls in pest resistance: current insights and future perspectives. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2025. Article No. eraf306. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraf306
Table of Contents
Original Article
Vishnyakov S.A., Oleynikov A.A., Krylov P.A. Meta-Analysis of Transcriptome Profiles of English Oak (Quercus robur L.) In Response to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Ìàthematical biology and bioinformatics. 2026;21(1):99-120. doi: 10.17537/2026.21.99
(published in Russian)

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References
Supplementary data

 
  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2026