Русская версия English version   
О журнале
Редакционная коллегия
Правила для авторов
Информация для читателей и авторов
Оглавление текущего номера
Архив
Контакты
Поиск

Отправить статью
 


Том 20   Выпуск 2   Год 2025
Список литературы

  1. Usdin K. The biological effects of simple tandem repeats: lessons from the repeat expansion diseases. Genome Res. 2008;18:1011–1019. doi: 10.1101/gr.070409.107
  2. Haubold B., Wiehe T. How repetitive are genomes? BMC Bioinform. 2006;7. Article No. 541. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-541
  3. Yi H., Song H., Hwang J., Kim K., Nierman W.C., Kim H.S. The tandem repeats enabling reversible switching between the two phases of β-lactamase substrate spectrum. PLoS Genet. 2014;10. Article No. e1004640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004640
  4. Bulik-Sullivan B., Finucane H.K., Anttila V., Gusev A., Day F.R., Loh P.R. ReproGen Consortium, Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Duncan L., et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:1236–1241. doi: 10.1038/ng.3406
  5. O’Dushlaine C.T., Edwards R.J., Park S.D., Shields D.C. Tandem repeat copy-number variation in protein-coding regions of human genes. Genome Biol. 2005;6. Article No. R69. doi: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-8-r69
  6. Hannan A.J. Tandem repeat polymorphisms: Mediators of genetic plasticity modulators of biological diversity and dynamic sources of disease susceptibility. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012;769:1–9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5434-2_1
  7. Liao X., Zhu W., Zhou J., Li H., Xu X., Zhang B., Gao X. Repetitive DNA sequence detection and its role in the human genome. Commun. Biol. 2023;6. Article No. 954. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05322-y
  8. Liao X., Li M., Zou Y., Wu F.-X., Yi-Pan, Wang J. Current challenges and solutions of de novo assembly. Quant. Biol. 2019;7:90–109. doi: 10.1007/s40484-019-0166-9
  9. Jain C., Rhie A., Hansen N.F., Koren S., Phillippy A.M. Long-read mapping to repetitive reference sequences using Winnowmap2. Nat. Methods. 2022;19(6):705–710. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01457-8
  10. Jakubosky D., D'Antonio M., Bonder M.J., Smail C., Donovan M.K.R., Young Greenwald W.W., Matsui H., i2QTL Consortium, D'Antonio-Chronowska A., Stegle O., et al. Properties of structural variants and short tandem repeats associated with gene expression and complex traits. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1). Article No. 2927. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16482-4
  11. Gymrek M., Willems T., Reich D., Erlich Y. Interpreting short tandem repeat variations in humans using mutational constraint. Nat. Genet. 2017;49(10):1495–1501. doi: 10.1038/ng.3952
  12. Castillo-Lizardo M., Henneke G., Viguera E. Replication slippage of the thermophilic DNA polymerases B and D from the Euryarchaeota Pyrococcus abyssi. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5. Article No. 403. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00403
  13. Aguilar M., Prieto P. Telomeres and Subtelomeres Dynamics in the Context of Early Chromosome Interactions During Meiosis and Their Implications in Plant Breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12. Article No. 672489. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.672489
  14. Lim C.J., Cech T.R. Shaping human telomeres: from shelterin and CST complexes to telomeric chromatin organization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021;22:283–298. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00328-y
  15. Lamb J.C., Birchler J.A. The role of DNA sequence in centromere formation. Genome Biol. 2003;4. Article No. 214. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-214
  16. Miga K.H., Alexandrov I.A. Variation and evolution of human centromeres: a field guide and perspective. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2021;55:583–602. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-020519
  17. Ishiura H., Doi K., Mitsui J., Yoshimura J., Matsukawa M.K., Fujiyama A., Toyoshima Y., Kakita A., Takahashi H., Suzuki Y., et al. Expansions of intronic TTTCA and TTTTA repeats in benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:581–590. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0067-2
  18. Albertin C.B., Simakov O., Mitros T., Wang Z.Y., Pungor J.R., Edsinger-Gonzales E., Brenner S., Ragsdale C.W., Rokhsar D.S. The octopus genome and the evolution of cephalopod neural and morphological novelties. Nature. 2015;524:220–224. doi: 10.1038/nature14668
  19. Sultanov D., Hochwagen A. Varying strength of selection contributes to the intragenomic diversity of rRNA genes. Nat. Commun. 2022;13. Article No. 7245. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34989-w
  20. Höweler C.J., Busch H.F.M., Geraedts J.P.M., Niermeijer M.F., Staal A. Anticipation in myotonic dystrophy: fact or fiction? Brain. 1989;112(3):779–797. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.3.779
  21. Taylor J.P., Brown Jr. R.H., Cleveland D.W. Decoding ALS: from genes to mechanism. Nature. 2016;539:197–206. doi: 10.1038/nature20413
  22. Fotsing S.F., Margoliash J., Wang C., Saini S., Yanicky R., Shleizer-Burko S., Goren A., Gymrek M. The impact of short tandem repeat variation on gene expression. Nat. Genet. 2019;51(11):1652–1659. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0521-9
  23. Gemayel R., Vinces M.D., Legendre M., Verstrepen K.J. Variable tandem repeats accelerate evolution of coding and regulatory sequences. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2010;44:445–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-072610-155046
  24. Mukamel R.E., Handsaker R.E., Sherman M.A., Barton A.R., Zheng Y., McCarroll S.A., Loh P.R. Protein-coding repeat polymorphisms strongly shape diverse human phenotypes. Science. 2021;373(6562):1499–1505. doi: 10.1126/science.abg8289
  25. Fueyo R., Judd J., Feschotte C., Wysocka J. Roles of transposable elements in the regulation of mammalian transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23(7):481–497. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00457-y
  26. Gemayel R., Cho J., Boeynaems S., Verstrepen K.J. Beyond junk-variable tandem repeats as facilitators of rapid evolution of regulatory and coding sequences. Genes (Basel). 2012;3(3):461–480. doi: 10.3390/genes3030461
  27. Shi Y., Niu Y., Zhang P., Luo H., Liu S., Zhang S., Wang J., Li Y., Liu X., Song T., et al. Characterization of genome-wide STR variation in 6487 human genomes. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1). Article No. 2092. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37690-8
  28. Schröder C., Horsthemke B., Depienne C. GC-rich repeat expansions: associated disorders and mechanisms. Med. Genet. 2022;33(4):325-335. doi: 10.1515/medgen-2021-2099
  29. Mandel J.L. Breaking the rule of three. Nature. 1997;386:767–768. doi: 10.1038/386767a0
  30. Lalioti M.D., Scott H.S., Buresi C., Rossier C., Bottani A., Morris M.A., Malafosse A., Antonarakis S.E.. Dodecamer repeat expansion in cystatin B gene in progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Nature. 1997;386:847–851. doi: 10.1038/386847a0
  31. Liquori C.L., Ricker K., Moseley M.L., Jacobsen J.F, Kress W., Naylor S.L., Day J.W., Ranum L.P.W. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9. Science. 2001;293:864–867. doi: 10.1126/science.106212
  32. Matsuura T., Fang P., Pearson C.E., Jayakar P., Ashizawa T., Roa B.B., D.L. Nelson. Interruptions in the expanded ATTCT repeat of spinocerebellar ataxia type 10: repeat purity as a disease modifier? Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006;78:125–129. doi: 10.1086/498654
  33. Richard G.F., Kerrest A., Dujon B. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;72:686–727. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00011-08
  34. Baran N., Lapidot A., Manor H. Formation of DNA triplexes accounts for arrests of DNA synthesis at d(TC)n and d(GA)n tracts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:507–511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.2.507
  35. Arimondo P.B., Barcelo F., Sun J.S., Maurizot J.C., Garestier T., Helene C. Triple helix formation by (G,A)-containing oligonucleotides: asymmetric sequence effect. Biochemistry. 1998;37:16627–16635. doi: 10.1021/bi9805588
  36. Rippe K., Fritsch V., Westhof E., Jovin T.M. Alternating d(G-A) sequences form a parallel-stranded DNA homoduplex. EMBO J. 1992;11(10):3777–3786. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05463.x
  37. Huertas D., Azorín F. Structural Polymorphism of Homopurine DNA Sequences. d(GGA)n and d(GGGA)n Repeats Form Intramolecular Hairpins Stabilized by Different Base-Pairing Interactions. Biochemistry. 1996;35:13125–13135. doi: 10.1021/bi961020+
  38. Shiber M.C., Braswell E.H., Klump H., Fresco J.R. Duplex-tetraplex equilibrium between a hairpin and two interacting hairpins of d(A-G)10 at neutral pH. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(24):5004–5012. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.24.5004
  39. Videvall E. Plasmodium parasites of birds have the most AT-rich genes of eukaryotes. Microb. Genom. 2018;4(2). Article No. e000150. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000150
  40. Bernardi G., Olofsson B., Filipski J., Zerial M., Salinas J., Cuny G., Meunier-Rotival M., Rodier F. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science. 1985;228(4702):953–958. doi: 10.1126/science.4001930
  41. Hurst L.D., Merchant A.R. High guanine-cytosine content is not an adaptation to high temperature: a comparative analysis amongst prokaryotes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2001;268:493–497. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1397
  42. Tetuev R.K., Nazipova N.N., Pankratov A.N., Dedus F.F. Search for Megasatellite Tandem Repeats in Eukaryotic Genomes by Estimation of GC-content Curve Oscillations. Маthematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2010;5(1):30–42. doi: 10.17537/2010.5.30
  43. Pankratov A.N., Gorchakov M.A., D.A.Dedus F.F., Dolotova N.S., Kulikova L.I., Makhortykh S.A., Nazipova N.N., Novikova, Olshevets M.M., Pyatkov M.I., et al. Spectral Analysis for Identification and Visualization of Repeats in Genetic Sequences. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 2009;19(4):687–692. doi: 10.1134/S105466180904018X
  44. Tetuev R.K., Nazipova N.N. Consensus of repeated region of mouse chromosome 6 containing 60 tandem copies of a complex pattern. Repbase Reports. 2010;10(5):776–776. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.10.fm
  45. Tetuev R.K., Dedus F.F., Nazipova N.N. Consensus of repeated region of rat chromosome 4 similar to mouse chromosome 6 repeated region, enclosed in the intergenic region between genes Hrh1 and Atg7. Repbase Reports. 2010;10(8):1185–1185.
  46. Liu J., Li Q., Hu Y., Yu Y., Zheng K., Li D., Qin L., Yu X. The complete telomere-to-telomere sequence of a mouse genome. Science. 2024;386(6726):1141–1146. doi: 10.1126/science.adq8191
  47. Tetuev R.K., Nazipova N.N. Fast 2Bit-Encoding for DNA Sequences in the TANDIS searching system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics”. Ed. V.D. Lakhno. Vol. 10. Pushchino: IMPB RAS, 2024. Paper No. e43. doi: 10.17537/icmbb24.59
  48. Dedus F.F., Kulikova L.I., Makhortykh S.A., Nazipova N.N., Pankratov A.N., Tetuev R.K. Analytical recognition methods for repeated structures in genomes. Doklady Mathematics. 2006;74(3):926–929. doi: 10.1134/S1064562406060354
  49. Tetuev R.K. Algebra of spectral transforms in data processing problems: PhD Thesis. M.: Computing Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2007 (in Russ.).
  50. Zhang Z., Schwartz S., Wagner L., Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2000;7(1–2):203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478
  51. Madeira F., Madhusoodanan N., Lee J., Eusebi A., Niewielska A., Tivey A.R.N., Lopez R., Butcher S. The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Research. 2024;52(W1):W521–W525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae241
  52. Jeffreys A.J., Murray J., Neumann R. High-resolution mapping of crossovers in human sperm defines a minisatellite-associated recombination hotspot. Mol. Cell. 1998;2(2):267–273. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80138-0
  53. Strand M., Prolla T.A., Liskay R.M., Petes T.D. Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature. 1993;365(6443):274–276. doi: 10.1038/365274a0
  54. Xu X., Peng M., Fang Z. The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon allele length. Nat. Genet. 2000;24(4):396–399. doi: 10.1038/74238
  55. Calabrese P.P., Durrett R.T., Aquadro C.F. Dynamics of microsatellite divergence under stepwise mutation and proportional slippage/point mutation models. Genetics. 2001;159(2):839–852. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.2.839
  56. Santibáñez-Koref M.F., Gangeswaran R., Hancock J.M. A relationship between lengths of microsatellites and nearby substitution rates in mammalian genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001;18(11):2119–2123. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003753
  57. Duret L., Galtier N. Biased Gene Conversion and the Evolution of Mammalian Genomic Landscapes. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2009;10:285–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001

 
Содержание
Оригинальная статья
Назипова Н.Н., Тетуев Р.К. Новый вид тандемных повторов в геноме Mus musculus – GC-богатые мегасателлиты. Математическая биология и биоинформатика. 2025;20(2):416-436. doi: 10.17537/2025.20.416
(опубликована на рус. яз.)

Аннотация (рус.)
Аннотация (англ.)
Полный текст (рус., pdf)
Список литературы
Доп. материалы
Перевод на англ. яз.

Nafisa Nazipova, Ruslan Tetuev A new type of tandem repeats in the genome of Mus musculus: GC-rich megasatellites. Маthematical biology and bioinformatics. 2025, 20(Suppl.):t44-t62. doi: 10.17537/2025.20.t44

Полный текст (англ., pdf)

 
  Copyright ИМПБ РАН © 2005-2026